|
|
Amazon.com's Price: Too low to display Prices subject to change.Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping.
Binding: ElectronicsBrand: Tamron EAN: 0725211097013 Item Dimensions: Label: Tamron Manufacturer: Tamron Maximum Focal Length: 75 millimeters Minimum Focal Length: 28 millimeters Model: AF09C-700 MPN: AF09C-700 Optical Zoom: 2.7 unknown-units Publisher: Tamron Studio: Tamron Features:
Accessories:
Editorial Review: Product Description: 28-75mm f/2.8 Di LD Aspherical (IF) Tamron zoom lens (A09E) * effective focal length: * 28-75mm with 35mm film or full-frame sensor digital cameras * 45-120mm with APS-C sensor Canon cameras * compatible with Canon digital and autofocus film SLR cameras * advanced optical design with low-dispersion, aspherical, and extra refractive index glass elements for superior image quality * internal focusing design maintains constant lens length for better balance and easier operation * special internal surface coatings to eliminate ghosting and flare * minimum focus distance: 13 inches (throughout zoom range) * diaphragm blades: 7 * attachment/filter size: 67mm * Amazon.com Product Description: Tamron applies the Di (Digitally Integrated) logo to lenses with optical systems designed to meet the performance characteristics of digital SLR cameras, and this 28-75mm Di autofocus zoom lens is no exception. Boasting revolutionary downsizing XR technology, the lens is among the smallest and lightest models in the history of fast zoom lenses. In fact, it looks just like an ordinary standard zoom lens, but offers a fast constant maximum aperture that will reshape your photographic horizons. Specific details include a constant maximum aperture of f/2.8, a minimum focusing distance of 13 inches, and a rotation-type zoom. As with all Tamron lenses, the 28-75mm lens carries a six-year warranty.
Average Rating:
![]() Rating: - works well, but full frame show imperfectionOn my full frame 5d there is a significant amount of vignetting, but that was rather expected being so much less expensive than the canon 24-70 L. Bought it because i am on a tight budget, and I dont regret it. Even with the vignetting- its still woth saving the 600+ dollar difference. Rating: - Good value for the money!This was my first non Canon lens purchase, granted the other lenses I've owned has been cheaper Canon lenses (kit lens, 50mm and 28-135mm). I've never owned an L so I can't compare it to those but here are my impressions: Price: Can't beat it, its a 2.8 like the better L lenses out there and for a fraction of the cost. Love it! Noise: Really can't say that its that noisy as I've heard people complain. Again I have not owned an L's so in my limited experience with lenses, ... Read More Rating: - Very nice at a great price!I bought this lens as my in-between lens for my Canon XT. I currently own the 50mm f/1.8 and the Tamron 70-300mm 4-4.5/6. I have been very pleased with it. It has a nice weight to it and is nice and sharp. I highly recommend it. Rating: - Good but it's not ALL THAT!I compared this to the my 50mm f/1.8 Canon lens (the $100 one). I zoomed the Tamron to 50mm and did some comparison shots at f/2.8. The Canon lens was much much sharper. So much in fact, I don't even want to take any more photos with the Tamron. Based on this experience, I'm upgrading to all L glass lenses. I'll upload my comparison photo which is an up-close shot of a green pitcher. The lens is a good value and I took some good photos with it. Although, with a 1.6 crop factor, it seems ... Read More Rating: - some good results, but red tinge and focusing are a problemI was excited to get my hands on this lens and spent the last 3 days taking pictures of everything and anything. In Arizona there is no shortage of sunshine, so these pictures were under "ideal" light conditions. First few shots taken from the office window looked pretty fuzzy. I set the camera to full auto and they seemed better. Over the next few days I experimented with various settings and found the lens rather hit and miss with focus. Items that should have been obvious point of focus ... Read More |