|
|
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping.
Binding: KitchenBrand: Lodge Color: Black EAN: 0075536065502 Label: Lodge Manufacturer: Lodge Model: HHMT MPN: HHMT Publisher: Lodge Release Date: March 01, 2004 Studio: Lodge Variation Description: Black Features:
Accessories: Editorial Review: Product Description: Heavy-duty Pyrotex outer fabric resists scorching and burning. Steam barrier, heavy cotton batting, and thick terry lining all combine to provide ultimate heat protection. Protection to 650 degrees F. Amazon.com Review: Protect your hands from hot pot handles with this slip-on handle mitt. From Lodge, maker of rugged cast-iron cookware, the mitt features heavy-duty Pyrotex fabric on the exterior, along with a scorch-proof coating. Inside, a thick terry lining feels comfortable against the skin, and thick cotton batting between the two layers adds further heat and steam protection. Heat-resistant up to 495 degrees F, the Max Temp mitt fits over stainless or cast-iron handles, indoors or at the barbecue, and comes in basic black to match any décor. --Ann Bieri Average Rating:
 Rating:  - You can't go wrongThese are great quality and really protect you from heat. They slip on easily and make for a comfortable grip, too. What more is there to say? You can't go wrong. Rating:  - Too small to useMaybe I don't know how to use these mitts, but they are tiny--too small to put your hands inside and too small to wrap around the handle to use. I don't understand their use. I unwrapped them before really looking at them or I would have returned them. Rating: - Hot temp pot handle mittThese are great for all pot handles, but especially for iron skillets. I bought six for both myself and as gifts. We all love them. I've seen these online for as much as $12.00 each . . . I only paid $6.00 each, so search carefully before you buy! Rating: - HOT HANDLE HOLDERVERY HANDY. WELL MADE.INSULATION IS GREAT. MUCH NEEDED WITH CAST IRON PANS. WILL CHECK THIS COMPANY OUT FOR MORE PRODUCTS. Rating:  - So soI should have gotten the cheaper one, would have done the same work but I would have had two! Not worth the price. |
