|
List Price: $59.99 Amazon.com's Price: $58.99 You Save: $1.00 ( 2%)Prices subject to change. Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping.
Binding: ElectronicsBrand: Hewlett-Packard EAN: 0883585142859 Item Dimensions: Label: Hewlett Packard Manufacturer: Hewlett Packard Model: F2215AA#ABA MPN: F2215AA#ABA Publisher: Hewlett Packard Studio: Hewlett Packard Features:
Editorial Review: Product Description: Get professional performance from HP s ultimate RPN scientific programmable calculator - ideal for engineers, surveyors, college students, scientists and medical professionals. Scientific projects require accuracy, functionality and dependability for success. The HP 35s scientific programmable calculator delivers them - and more - with features that include 30KB user memory, your choice of RPN and algebraic entry-system logic, a convenient two-line display, and the time-saving HP Solve application. Amazon.com Product Description: Ideal for college students, engineers, surveyors, and medical personnel, the HP 35s scientific calculator offers calculation versatility in one economical unit. For added versatility, the HP 35s lets users choose between RPN or algebraic entry-system logic (no other scientific calculator offers both). It also features a large, two-line alphanumeric display to view entries, results, menus, and prompts with ease. The display also sports an adjustable contrast feature, making it ideal to use both indoors and out. A robust library of 100+ built-in functions and constants also comes pre-loaded for immediate use right out of the box. A robust memory ensures even the largest calculations go smoothly and quickly, and more than 800 independent storage registers allow users to store an equation, then use it again to solve any variable, or employ the equation in conjunction with any of the 100+ built-in functions. The calculator is backed by a manufacturer's 1-year limited warranty. What's in the Box HP 35s scientific calculator, batteries, user's manual, and premium protective case. Average Rating:
 Rating:  - HP 35sMy first HP was the 35 and I've been been buying HP's (lots of them)since the 70's. Used the 33s for 2 years but I was disappointed in the display and buttons but liked many other features. The 35s retains the good features of the 33s but with a number of improvements such as the equation editor and improved button (Enter) location. The 35s is just what I've been looking for - well done HP. Rating: - Excelent Return to HP QualityWhat can I say? This is an excellent low priced non graphical scientific calculator using RPN entry. I like the "Classic" look and feel, and have enjoyed using it to solve some simple and not so simple problems I give to my classes (such as Newtons Law of cooling for dead bodies, Radioactive decay, percent oxygen bound to hemoglobin etc). A great buy for those who do not need a CAS of graphing capabilities! I highly recommend it! Rating: - HP 35sThe calculator was functional. I had to learn a different way of working with it, as it does not have a equal button. The dual display is a little difficult to work with, if you have never dealt with it before. My last scientific calculator was a HP 22S which was over 18 years old and unfortunatley broke. I just have to get use to dealing with the newer methods and techniques of this calculator. HP does make a great product and I'm sure over time I will learn to work with this new model also. ... Read More Rating: - HP35s Perfect for RPN based technical math.I went to Texas A&M in 1981 so I learned math with RPN and the HP 10C. It is great to have something as durable and easy to use as that older model. This one just adds icing to the cake by adding programmability. Rating:  - Excellent -- but not for complex mathIt's a fine calculator. I won't go over RPN vs. algebraic and the other features so thoroughly covered in other reviews here. Let me focus on the only "con" that limits it from being a great calculator: It has lousy handling of complex values. What do I mean by lousy? I'm not so bothered by the lack of rectangular to polar and back. What I AM bothered by is: -- No complex square root or square -- No complex log10 or 10^x -- No complex hyperbolics ... Read More |
