Business & Office
Children's Software
Education & Reference
Games
Graphics
Home & Hobbies
Language & Travel
Linux
Macintosh
Networking
Operating Systems
Personal Finance
Programming
Software for Handhelds
Utilities
Video & Music
Web Development



Antiques
Art
Autos
Baby
Books
Camera & Photo
Cleaning Supplies
Clothing
Computers
Computer & Video Games
Collectibles
DVD
Education
Electronics
Entertainment
Health & Fitness
Jewelry
Kids
Kitchen & Housewares
Magazines
Motorcycle gear
Music
Pets
Outdoor Living
Software
Sports
Tools & Hardware
Toys & Games
Video

Best Webhosts
Webmaster Tips


Shopping Mall
Health & Fitness
Electronics Toys & Games

VMware Fusion [OLD VERSION] Software
In association with Amazon.com
 Find great shopping deals on VMware Fusion [OLD VERSION]!   

 
 
 

Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Nearly ideal
I'm not even going to bother explaining the usefulness of VMWare, there are plenty of reviews doing just that and doing it well...

Parallels vs VMware

I've used both Parallels and VMware Fusion, each have their positives and negatives. For instance...
Parallels 3 can boot off windows in on a USB drive VMware cannot (nor can windows)
Parallels 3 can boot off non-bootable eSATA ports. VMware cannot
Parallels 3 can populate Mac with Windows applications so you can set "Open WIth Prefs" to a Window application in OS X to an application Virtual Machine and from the . VMware cannot.
VMware can boot 64-bit XP. Parallels cannot.
VMware can use two cores. Parallels cannot.
Both support integrated Application windows that allow one to virtually "Hide" the Windows Desktop so Apps appear to be more seemless.


However for the most part VMWare is faster and more robust lacking a few of the annoying glitches that inhibited the usefulness of Parallels. Parallels often would glitch on direct drag and drop from Mac to PC desktop and would require an Application restart to allow this functionality to return. Notably VMware is noticeably faster, on my Mac Pro, with plenty of cores to spare, the dual processor functionality is a no-brainer.

For non-gamers such as myself, VMware Fusion's "Good enough" performance is to forever say goodbye to BootCamp reboots.



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Works like it says!!
This product installed very easily and works seamlessly with ALL my Peripherals and MAC programs including the Bluetooth mouse. I'm running on an Airport wireless network with a wireless printer.



Rating: 1 out of 5 stars - Mixed Feelings
I tried this product for a business project where I needed to use Windows XP & Vista. The system I used was an iMac Penryn Intel Core2Duo 2.8GHZ, 4GB Ram, 500GB Hard Disk, OS 10.5 Leopard. Installation was easy, but neither operating system would stay activated. Each time we started it up it would require reactivation. We own our licenses, but if we have to reactivate each time we start the virtual machine, it becomes annoying and also raises red flags to Microsoft. Support seemed non-existent. When we actually did get support it was almost a week after we submitted the claim. We ended up returning this to Amazon and used an actual PC instead for the project.



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - VMware Fusion + RAM = Perfect MacBook
Purchased this along with 4BG of RAM for my Black MacBook. Installed Windows XP as the "Virtual Machine". Everything works flawlessly. Now I have my Mac and my favorite Windows programs all in the same place! Very VERY useful.

For those that don't know. This software "tricks" Windows XP into thinking it is installed on it's own computer. In reality, Windows XP is installed on the Mac Hard Drive. So when you start VMWare, it starts Windows XP in its own Mac window. You even see the Windows XP startup dialog! So imagine running XP in a Window with Mac OS X and you have the idea. You can also run the XP (or Vista, or whatever) operating system "full screen".

The best way to have the best of both operating systems.



Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Fusion operates excellently
As a former Virtual PC user (slow and buggy doesn't even begin to describe how that program works), I was delighted to find a beautiful integration of windows functionality into the Mac OS. I tried all three available for Core Duo chips and found Fusion to be fastest, most flexible, and least buggy. When I tried loading one of my behemoth data processing programs onto Parallels, not only was it slow, the graphics were choppy and often undecipherable. Crossover is limited in what I can put in there and currently does not support xml programs, the new standard. I use crossover still because it runs the programs without opening up a virtual windows program. But my mainstay is Fusion as I can open ebooks made with windows only programs, run my 5 or six important data processing programs and move data back and forth across platforms. I also found accessing all the information on the mac part of the drive easier on Fusion than on Parallels, but maybe I didn't try hard enough. The mac drive shows up under "My Computer" and you're in. I can download anything into OSX and access it later in the fusion window. It makes my workday less complicated. All in all, this is an excellent product. I can't think of any downsides as I haven't bumped into problems yet and I use this product daily.


page 11 of  45
 6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16 

 

New - Buy Groceries

Magazine Subscriptions

Search for Posters



Health & Personal Care

This site is Hosted by Bluehost

Read my Bluehost Review